Greg: Thanks for the clarification. I missed the subtle tone of your comment... :-)
I was more elaborating for the benefit of those on the list who may not know about that bit of history. Didn't mean to be directing my remark as a response to you. Regards, Richard. > From: Greg Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net > Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:07:04 -0800 (PST) > To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Integrating mailman > > I was actually being sarcastic. MUch of the recent work on Mailman is > the work of Lee's successor. In fact, the "big patch", XM*7.1*50 is > nothing short of a new version. But before that, Lee Hirz had a > distinguished "career" as the Mailman developer. I guess my off-hand > comment was my way of praising Lee for his contribution to the > development of Mailman. > > --- "Richard G. DAVIS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... .... ..... ...... ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
