--- steven mcphelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is nothing wrong with either DSM nor Cache. Both are strictly > within > the ANSI standard M.
I agree. I hope no one intepreted my message as a criticism of Cache, DSM, GTM, or any other platform. That was not my point. > They both respond with exactly the same > results. > > DSM executes the line and thus the variable is <UNDEF> after > executing the > line of code as it should. > Good point! The 1S1> prompt does indicate debug mode. But my point was that I don't believe the standard says one way or another what should happen in this case. To be honest, I'm so busy right now that I was only able to skim the relevant sections. I hope to go through them in more detail a soon as I get the chance. A practical man is a man who practices the errors of his forefathers. --Benjamin Disraeli ==== Greg Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
