Chris Richardson wrote: >Is GT.M Open Source, ported >onto OS X, still Open Source when it is run on OS X? Or is it that >licensing is now owed to Fidelity (it isn't the X86 architecture any more)?
It seems clear to me that if the port was based entirely on the GNU GPL source for GT.M for Linux/X86 that it would naturally be Open Source and still under GPL. If the port was based on proprietary knowledge from one of Fidelity's other implementations of GT.M, then the licensing would be Fidelity's choice. --------------------------------------- Jim Self Systems Architect, Lead Developer VMTH Computer Services, UC Davis (http://www.vmth.ucdavis.edu/us/jaself) ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
