That was 1.0.23.15 that was modified, and we are circling the wagons on the 
problem that we had with my server, so before we spend the time fixing 
another version, why don't we get this one fixed.  

However, I wanted to see the messaging with Ismet's to give us a head start on 
the next one and to see what the message that seems to be causing the problem 
with the other one looks like.

On Saturday 23 April 2005 09:43 am, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
> Ismet,
>
> Comments below:
>
> --- "Ismet Kursunoglu, MD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > I did a fresh install/config using Bhaskar's
> > VistAFOIA20050227 to a
> > server/demo laptop and tried to connect over a local
> > switch here with
> > CPRS 1.0.25.28 (another laptop running
> > Debian/Sarge)- it presents the
> > login and then complains about the now famous
> > ActiveX control, and
> > finally hangs with this screenshot summing it all up
> > -
> >
> > http://www.alaskaclinic.com/cprswine.png
>
> The standard CPRS has a TWebBrowser object that has to
> be cut out.  Only the CPRS with the custom splash
> screen has the modifications.
>
> > The server laptop is running Debian
> > 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 with
> > /etc/apt/sources.list being "deb
> > http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64/ sid
> > main non-free contrib"
> > with the 32 compat layer installed.
> >
> > Some of the output from the wine session follows. I
> > know that Nancy and
> > Aric had worked on getting this to work and I was
> > wondering if there was
> > any simple solution available? The wine version is
> > 20050310 and as a
> > side note it is now running QuickBooks 6.0 perfectly
> > on the same laptop.
> >
> > I tried running the "fixed" version from Kevin's
> > site
> > http://69.68.182.66/downloads/OpenVista/wine-CPRS
> > but after login there is a complaint screen about
> > server/client
> > incompatibility. Screen shot at ->
> >
> > http://www.alaskaclinic.com/serverclient.png
> >
> > Is this generally the case with CPRS versions
> > following the particular
> > Vista server release? Can the same juju be applied
> > to CPRS 1.0.25.28? Or
> > does the Codeweavers product give me the "fix" for
> > any version of CPRS?
>
> I wish that server enhancements were backward
> compatible, but they are not.  So the server has to
> match the CPRS client.
>
> We only worked on 1.0.25.15.  Yes, the same changes
> could be made for 1.0.25.28, but it is a matter of
> sitting down and modifying the code.  Nancy has the
> source code that I modified.  I forgot to get a copy
> of it before I left.  I tried to put a "//kt" beside
> every modification I put in the code, so one could
> search for those in the current version and copy them
> to a newer version.
>
> Another question is whether you can get back to an
> older version of the server if you wanted to use the
> current version.
>
> Also, Rick announced a new formal version of OpenVistA
> to be released after the R&D meeting in Seattle.  I'm
> not sure which server version that will include.  We
> will have to get a wine-CPRS to match that.
>
> > I am still in the NYC area - I have met informally
> > with a few medical
> > groups (small to large/enterprise) and talked in
> > general about the
> > WorldVista project (in addition to many other
> > topics)- so far there has
> > been a huge amount of interest. It is going to be
> > very helpful to get my
> > new clinic up and running on this platform/solution
> > - as seeing is
> > believing.
> >
> > I was also thinking that it might be helpful, as
> > others have mentioned,
> > to run a more full featured demo site in parallel as
> > I bring up our
> > internal production system - i.e. one that would
> > allow anyone to connect
> > and see what a working VistA system is like. I would
> > be more than happy
> > to host such demo projects on the alaskaclinic.com
> > site.
>
> I.e. our own demo site, perhaps with the wine-enabled
> software.  Users could use vnc to connect to your box.
>
> Good luck on everything.
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Hardhats-members mailing list
> Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members

-- 
Nancy Anthracite


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members

Reply via email to