I'm not suggesting that image quality be sacrificed, only that scroll bars or some other mechanism be provided so that it is possible to use the application at 800x600.
===
Gregory Woodhouse

"And the end of all our exploring

will be to arrive where we started

And know the place for the first time" -- T.S. Eliot




On Jun 9, 2005, at 5:49 AM, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:

We have had the same issue in my office.  Many in my staff wants me to lower the resolution to 800x600 because they feel the letters are too small in 1024x768.  Then at the lower resolution, the letter edges are rough and it drives me crazy.  But they like it apparently.  Go figure...
 
Kevin


Gregory Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the single point on which I get the most pushback (for the 
Visual SAC) is that user interfaces need to be usable (e.g., by 
providing scrollbars) on an 800x600 display. UI designers don't want 
to hear it, insisting that providers have bigger screens and that 
they want to use them. There is one application that always forces me 
to set my resolution at 1024x7068 (because otherwise windows are 
clipped and there are components to which I have no access). It 
drives me crazy!

Reply via email to