On Tuesday 07 June 2005 06:44, K.S. Bhaskar wrote: > >>4. Network services can now be written in GT.M and deployed under > >>inetd/xinetd. > > [KSB] This will allow the new "direct connect" CPRS GUI to be used more > easily. Effectively, it means that VistA can be packaged & deployed > like other network services under inetd/xinetd, which is a standard way > of deploying network services on UNIX/Linux.
StandAlone vs xinetd/inetd superserver. Can it still be run stand alone? In a busy institution what would the benefits of using a superserver rather than standalone process? Ease of configuration? System Resources? Connection control? Usually less often used services are run under xinetd/inetd to save system resources and fine tune security and connection control. -- Mark Street, RHCE http://www.oswizards.com -- Key fingerprint = 3949 39E4 6317 7C3C 023E 2B1F 6FB3 06E7 D109 56C0 GPG key http://www.oswizards.com/pubkey.asc ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
