There are no biases around here. Right?
Actually, I would hope a peer reviewer for a paper could come up
with something a little better than "This paper is lousy." They had
better if they really want there opinion to be taken seriously!
VistA is not without its flaws and omissions, but it's a big leap
from that to the "review" you quoted.
===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"A practical man is a man who practices the errors of his
forefathers. -- Benjamin Disraeli
On Jul 23, 2005, at 10:20 AM, Joseph Dal Molin wrote:
mailing lists for the most part, unless designed to be so, are poor
mediums for objective peer review...Hardhats being an exception of
course!!!
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
