That's right. --- James Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And that is what would happen if the order of operations were changed > unless > there were a new command that had a different order of operations. > Jim > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gregory Woodhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net> > Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 10:10 PM > Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] MUMPS features > > > >I can assure you that the SACC would like nothing more than to avoid > > >placing unnecessary burdens on the user/programmer. The issue here > is > >whether relaxing limits like the restriction on string lengths would > break > >existing applications. > > > > === > > Gregory Woodhouse > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > "Design quality doesn't ensure success, but design failure can > ensure > > failure." > > > > --Kent Beck > > === Gregory Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Design quality doesn't ensure success, but design failure can ensure failure." --Kent Beck ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
