Gentlemen;

   Please be aware that there are some additions to the FOIA as implemented
in VistA Office.  Some of these are Pediatrics, OB/Gyn, and support for
Billing.  These are not represented in the FOIA currently.  The expectation
is that these functionalities will be aded to the FOIA eventually (after
they have been worked out in the field for a while and these test sites get
the functionality stabilized and add some new functionality (this is what
VistA is good for, extension to fit more needs).  Not all of the VA
functionality is currently turned on in the VistA Office because in private
practice, a lot of the questions that the VA ask are of no interest to the
private practice (Years of Millitary Service, branch of military service,
etc).

   There is much new that will make configuring VistA easier so that
specific aspects can be turned on and off selectively by the implementor.
This capability is expected to migrate into the VA VistA model and back to
the FOIA VistA.  By the time it hits the FOIA VistA it will have been
checked by CMS, VA, and a hunk of the testing community.   This is all a
process, and processes need time to adjust and adapt, something that the
VistA model has shown time and time again.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Todd Berman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Re: CMS NEWS: ELECTRONIC HEALTH
RECORD,SOFTWARE DELIVERED TO, PHYSICIAN OFFICES


> On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 12:25 -0400, Dr. Schrom wrote:
> > I'm not opposed to allowing authors of proprietary software to have free
rein
> > to market their software and support as aggressively as their business
ethics
> > allows. VistA is in the public domain under FOIA, therefore CMS really
shouldn't
> > have the right to release a derivative of it (i.e. Vista-office) in any
way
> > which restricts "public" access to it.  I should have the right to
install it
> > without vendor support. Sure, GPL projects flop, but the GOOD ones
survive
> > largely because of "support" from communities like Hardhats. I haven't
met
> > any of them personally, but there are some really bright people on this
list,
> > and if the can work someone like me through an installation of VistA, I
don't
> > feel that I want or need paid support, and I should not be required to
buy it.
>
>
> No. That is *WHAT* Public Domain means. It means anyone can take
> anything and do anything with it. Which is why CMS can take VistA, and
> release a version of it they sell only to doctors with red hair if they
> want. It is a piece of software under the public domain, they are free
> to do what they would with it, but *you are too*.
>
> No one can force you to buy or pay anything for VistA, as the FOIA is
> under public domain. But VOE is a totally different beast.
>
> I believe the hope on this list is that CMS will release it into the
> public domain or at least a opensource license, however I am not even
> sure that has been confirmed.
>
> Just because software is given away doesn't make it opensource, or in
> the public domain.
>
> --Todd
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
Download
> it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
> Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
> _______________________________________________
> Hardhats-members mailing list
> Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
>
>




-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members

Reply via email to