That is only because you chose not to use the functionality that COM offers within CPRS. There are many applications that do make extensive use of the COM object within CPRS. Without a COM like replacement, those applications would loose their appeal. Preserving the COM functionality is one of the design criteria that the VA rehosting of CPRS would try to preserve if they could. And not only preserve it but enhance it to address known short-comings of the existing COM function.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Toppenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 8:43 AM Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Cost to convert CPRS to Java <snip> Again, as I have looked at CPRS, the only COM object used is TWebBrowser. And I was able to take that out for the Wine CPRS without any significant change to CPRS. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
