On Jun 15, 2006, at 4:32 PM, CamSchlehuber wrote:
It's also vaguely reminiscent of the HL7v3 approach to self-describing messages, at least if I understand your description (!) correctly.
I'm inclined to agree.
Yes.
It would be interesting to hear more about this. I've seen some approaches (often very interesting) to integrating the object and database approaches, but nothing that I've found entirely satisfactory. Then again, I've had the nagging sense that the whole object oriented approach isn't sufficiently general. Consider that object oriented modeling gives us various types of relationships and hierarchies ("is-a", "has-a", "uses", etc.) but provides no convincing framework that encompasses them all. UML tries to do this, to an extent, with the stereotype concept, but I don't know that it gets very far (or, at least, it hasn't to date). Gregory Woodhouse "Judge a man by his questions not his answers." --Voltaire |
_______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members