The problem with the Parameter approach is that you have to essentially emulate what Fileman is doing.  Everytime your code is called, you have to save the last entry that user entered and then store an appropriate value in your parameter.  Of course, you have to recall the parameter value each time in order to get the default value.  If you are using interactive Fileman calls what is the advantage of using parameters instead of Fileman's method?

On 6/25/06, Kevin Toppenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you know how to do this?  I don't.

Kevin


If you need to store data on
> a per user basis, I still recommend using Kernel parameters.
>

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members



--
Steven McPhelan
"If you have any trouble sounding condescending, find a Unix user to show you how it's done." -- Scott Adams
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members

Reply via email to