Can ya'll point me at some of this information that has some step-by-step
instructions?

Thanks,
Bobby

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of warpmedia
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 8:09 AM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] Securing IE



Thane Sherrington (S) wrote:
> At 08:12 PM 02/11/2005, warpmedia wrote:
> 
>> 1. DrpoMyRights is not a perfect solution, it only protects if 
>> launched with that shortcut.
> 
> 
> Yeah, but I can only do so much for end users.
> 
>> Best solution for IE6 is to change all protocol defaults to Restricted 
>> Zone & use a 3rd party App like AdIEFltr to whitelist into the 
>> Internet zone. Caveat: it costs money, requires users to "get it" 
>> concerning machine names + domains, and can require extensive testing 
>> to get all a given sites URL's whitelisted.
> 
> 
> Well, it's end users, so you know that it's got to be simple, or they 
> won't use it.  So I think DropMyRights might be the best solution for IE 
> users.

If they don't learn how to switch from Restricted they get nowhere. 
Sounds perfect, learn or not be able to use and not get around it by 
reseting the Internet zone to defaults. Reset is 1st thing most TS will 
tell them to do if they have problems, IE settings/lock down solution 
out the window! Changing protocol defaults does survive the reset.  =)

I forgot, there is also a semi-brain dead tool from ms that allows easy 
switching of a site into Restricted or Trusted which could be used with 
a Trusted zone (modified) to only be as trusting as the default Internet 
zone.

Well even with DropMyRights I'd imagine there's the ability to screw up 
the current user, so it's "better" like having a fig leaf makes you 
"dressed". Nothing short of Restricted zone by default defeats ActiveX & 
Java being on by default even if damage they can do is minimized by user 
rights.

> 
>> Better solution is FF & NoScript and then some sort of FF extension to 
>> launch IE using DropMyRights shortcut for the FF challenged sites.
> 
> 
> Yeah, FF and NoScript is probably the best way to go, but once again, 
> NoScript requires thought and education, and I find those are two things 
> most users don't want to deal with.

Yes, but with FF + NoScript it's a straight forward process to enable a 
site (& related sites) unlike AdIEFilters inability to just enable a 
domain without manual tweaking per site.

Certainly encouraging them to switch to FF + NoScript is not only 
advised but easier since NoScript has added functionality MS has left 
abandoned for years. If you could get them doing that much + make the 
basic changes to IE you suggest for the stubborn sites it would be a 
step in the right direction (assuming you mean IE6 under XP Sp2).

I digress, nothing short of doing it the right way is the right way and 
only FF+NoScript and/or AdIEFilter (or the MS tool), and a bit of users 
using their brains (i.e. learning) is the right way.

Good luck!

Reply via email to