on a side note I beta test for Duocor and system guardian backup, my source in Japan tells me Vista is giving them fits, backups do not boot being the main one so something else is afoot if even something that should be simple as a backup will not boot. Means a new version of ghost too I'm sure.
Me on the fence on this one. fp At 03:13 PM 6/4/2006, CW Poked the stick with: >I'm glad that Microsoft danced us up and talked to us about how great Vista >would be, and how it would really drive the market. Right now, based on what >I have in front of me, I don't see it. With Windows XP betas, Win2k, even >Windows 95, you walked out of it saying "There are at least 5-10 features that >are fundamental OS changes that significantly impact work". Vista isn't any >of those. Unlike XP which really changed the way for USB connectivity, >brought NTFS home, as well as significant improvements in networking and drive >management.. Vista just doesn't seem to bring a single "functionality" change >to Windows that makes you say "this is a must have". > >I keep getting email from MS that intones that hey, it's not functionally >complete. Ok, fine. But unless the functionality is a total scrap of the UI >as well as a change in the file structure, mapping and networking >functionality which right now seem like a throwback in usability, I don't know >how adding more things helps this frankenstein. -- Tallyho ! ]:8) Taglines below ! -- Man: There is nothing more miserable and more arrogant.
