I've had no troubles in 6 months using Naslite on a p3-866 440bx w/4 750gb 
drives as a nas.  


Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From: "Greg Sevart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:20:57 
To:<hardware@hardwaregroup.com>
Subject: Re: [H] big hd opinions?


You're going to need an add-in PCI card anyway. The 440BX in that BX6 board
only supported ATA33, and didn't support 48bit LBA. Hence, no drives > 128GB
are supported. The OS may be able to override this, but would you trust it?
Plus, assuming you're using gigabit, your interface is going to limit your
throughput.

2 hot spares for 4 spindles is a little overkill. I generally only use one
HS unless the spindle count is > 15. (ie: the smallish 30-spindle EMC SAN I
just deployed has 2 hotspares, which is actually more than EMC's recommended
1 per 30). Any reason why you wouldn't just use RAID10?

Greg

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DHSinclair
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 6:58 PM
> To: Hardware Group
> Subject: [H] big hd opinions?
>
> Ready to build my NAS.  The m/b is a very old Abit BX6 r2.0 with an
> Intel
> P2-450. And I want it to run headless; like a humming box (appliance)
> in
> the corner!  I suspect this puts SATA drives out of class ATM, unless I
> try
> some PATA/SATA adapters.  This is possible; but was really planning to
> use
> PATA drives due to the m/b's age.
>
> The OS will be some flavor of the current NASLite series. Can not
> decide
> which version to buy ATM.
>
> Looking for opinions and/or user experience with the crop of >100GB
> hard
> drives. The plan is to try 4x 500GB drives. 2 hot, 2 as hot spares.
>
> Opinions welcome.
> Best,
> Duncan


Reply via email to