Greg, Thank you. OK, I will be moving to a 'hub-and-spoke' approach. Thanks for the name! Yes, I have been operating in a 'cascade' manner since the beginning of my LAN.
Time to try a new approach. Nicely, I can do this with just a few new cables!
Best, Duncan On 08/17/2013 20:34, Greg Sevart wrote:
Either configuration would be fine assuming the router/switch ports are gigabit. A hub-and-spoke approach is technically superior to the cascaded design you were previously using. In practice it's unlikely to make a material difference either way for low device counts and throughput requirements. -----Original Message----- From: hardware-boun...@lists.hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-boun...@lists.hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of DSinc Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2013 6:17 PM To: HWG Subject: [H] LAN Question? Maybe I'm not so smart. My home has 2 switches. I sorta/kinda 'uplink' them; and, on to my Gateway/Router. I have been thininking of just wiring each switch (port 16) to the Gateway/Router. This allows both the East and West sides of my home to connect at the Gateway/Router instead of playing/hoping the 'uplink'/'dwnlink' business between the 2 switches really works(?). I am starting to have doubts. I am willing to let the new Gateway/Router be the 'go between' (sit in the middle). Thoughts, opinions??????????? Duncan
