I’ve been advised in the past that you shouldn’t go over 80% on a breaker or they may trip.
> On Oct 30, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Kurt L Keville <[email protected]> wrote: > > Seems like the logical place for it… and so far Tom and Bill on this list > have the best suggestions… if this isn’t hardware hacking I don’t know what > is… > > Here’s my problem… it might have an electronic fix but it more likely is an > EE101 and NEC code thing… > > I have 2 (20A) Geist PDUs… http://geistapp.geistglobal.com/specs/1136 > <http://geistapp.geistglobal.com/specs/1136> > I have 3 (12A) servers… > http://www.supermicro.com/aplus/system/2u/2042/as-2042g-6rf.cfm > <http://www.supermicro.com/aplus/system/2u/2042/as-2042g-6rf.cfm> > > In the aggregate I am fine on current (36A < 40A) but my grains are a little > course here… is there a way to load balance the 20A services? There are some > rather esoteric tie-bar and breaker ganging ideas out there but I would have > to convince an electrician I would deploy this box only under certain > conditions (like the upstream wiring being specced for 40A)… > > We spent a lot of time upgrading the servers; I suppose I could downgrade > them to the point that I could put 2 on one circuit… this is an odd problem > and stems from the SCC we are entering next month… kind of a dumb rule seeing > as we are supposed to be solving real-world problems… > http://sc15.supercomputing.org/conference-program/student-programs/sc15-student-cluster-competition/scc-competition-rules > > <http://sc15.supercomputing.org/conference-program/student-programs/sc15-student-cluster-competition/scc-competition-rules>_______________________________________________ > Hardwarehacking mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/hardwarehacking > <http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/hardwarehacking>
_______________________________________________ Hardwarehacking mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/hardwarehacking
