On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 13:54 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > Unless you show us some hard profiling data, I don't think there's much I can > do. If it's good to run Firefox and GNOME, it out to be fast enough for a > mobile screen... If you don't do anything else, it's no surprise that > harfbuzz is taking 95% of the time. That doesn't mean anything.
Obviously if I don't do anything else 95% is not much, but I do. Anyhow, as I said my reply to Keith, I think the problem was actually me destroying the harfbuzz cache too often, I'll address that and let you know if I find it's harfbuzz's fault. Thanks, Tom. _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
