> > There is a further issue. Is <consonant1, sign_e, virama, consonant2> > a correct Brahmi sequence for two syllables?
Yup. Technically, it should be two syllables <c1+sign_e+virama> & <c2> V On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 at 08:07, Richard Wordingham < richard.wording...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:04:07 +0200 > Vinodh Rajan <vin...@virtualvinodh.com> wrote: > > > I am not sure if this is due to HB doing incorrect clustering of > > Brahmi syllables or just incorrect > > OT features in my font. > > There is a further issue. Is <consonant1, sign_e, virama, consonant2> > a correct Brahmi sequence for two syllables? I suspect this will be > split up by HarfBuzz as <consonant1, sign_e> <U25CC_glyph, virama, > consonant2>, as seems to happen with Tai Tham. I'm going by my Tai > Tham font that doesn't attempt to correct the USE, Da Lekh Seri - I am > very rushed at the moment. This would fall foul of the combination of > virama with a consonant that needs to happen before Indic > rearrangement. If the correct encoding is <consonant1, sign_e, virama, > ZWNJ, consonant2>, then my simple hack should work well. > > Richard. > _______________________________________________ > HarfBuzz mailing list > HarfBuzz@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz > -- http://www.virtualvinodh.com
_______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list HarfBuzz@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
