> Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2019 20:29:15 +0100 > From: Richard Wordingham <richard.wording...@ntlworld.com> > Cc: harfbuzz@lists.freedesktop.org > > On Sun, 02 Jun 2019 21:01:35 +0300 > Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > The version of HarfBuzz I built on Windows and am using with Emacs has > > Graphite support, so I reckon I don't have to worry about picking up a > > Graphite shaper? > > It depends what you want to do with the shaper. If you want to study > what it does in the way of sequencing the glyphs, you need to ensure > you use the shaper you want to study! The order the glyphs are > presented to the renderer may be very different between using a > Graphite shaper and using the HarfBuzz OpenType shaper. For one thing, > swapping glyphs round is easy in Graphite and complicated in OpenType.
I don't think I understand what you mean by "Graphite shaper". I'm using just HarfBuzz (which has Graphite capabilities); no other shaper is involved. _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list HarfBuzz@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
