I can't agree write JVM in Java. It's crazy. We should make it more powerful, at least we can against .Net.
On 5/11/05, Fernando Lozano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > See how today we have many high-quality network servers, database > drivers, IDEs, compilers, interpreters and other kinds of system-level > software written in Java. If Java has proven to be more productive for > these software, why not for the VM itself? There's no reason we should > still be dealing with zero-bytes at the end of strings and size of > buffers at every string copy. > > []s, Fernando Lozano > > sergio escreveu: > > > I agree. > > > > Steve Blackburn escreveu: > > > >> I would like advocate the use of Java in implementing the VM (*). > >> This may seem a low-level issue, but I'm raising it now because it > >> will have significant implications for the VM core and the overall > >> approach this project takes. > >> > >> Why? a) Software engineering benefits. b) Performance. c) "Eating > >> your own dog food" is good for you. > > > >
