maybe we can think the JIT Compiler as a simple box which input "bytecode" and output "machine code".
In such a case, of course we can choose the Java language to implements the JIT itself. Hm.... I'd consider JIT compilers pretty low-level. > > Do you guys really think we can integrate this > low-level with a higher-level language easily? > > ...despite that it just sounds really big and > memory consuming. > > I am only expressing some fears here. > Would be glad to be proven wrong. > > cheers > -- > Torsten > > >
