[snip]
> 
> GCJ begins to fall short where you wish to use Java's dynamic 
> loading/linking capabilities.  Classes must be loaded 
> dynamically, garbage collected when they're no longer used, 
> and integrated with the existing code.  They must be 
> bytecode-verified and sandboxed.  I'm sure that someone who's 
> really clever could make this all work under GCJ.  
> But it essentially requires the "glueing together" of two 
> very distinct compilation models --- the static and the 
> dynamic.  And it is unsatisfactory for many applications if 
> the dynamically loaded code behaves differently --- for 
> example, runs 3-5X slower because it's being interpreted.  A 
> fully dynamic fully JIT-based system seems simpler and more 
> likely to work well for these applications.
> 

This is a really big deal.

Most modern Java programs make extensive use of dynamic loading &
linking, and that usage is increasing.

Recent releases of the Sun VM have put a lot of emphasis on speeding up
the performance of reflection and this has been one of the big
performance boosters in these VMs.

[snip]

Nick


IMPORTANT: This e-mail, including any attachments, may contain private or 
confidential information. If you think you may not be the intended recipient, 
or if you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender 
immediately and delete all copies of this e-mail. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you must not reproduce any part of this e-mail or disclose its 
contents to any other party.
This email represents the views of the individual sender, which do not 
necessarily reflect those of education.au limited except where the sender 
expressly states otherwise.
It is your responsibility to scan this email and any files transmitted with it 
for viruses or any other defects.
education.au limited will not be liable for any loss, damage or consequence 
caused directly or indirectly by this email. 

Reply via email to