Nether support apt, AFAIK, which seens to be an easier task to do with the Eclipse compiler.
Rodrigo On 5/16/05, Nick Lothian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>>>> "Berlin" == Berlin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Berlin> The compiler seems to be a non-issue at this time > > with a focus > > Berlin> on the JavaVM. What are your thoughts on the different > > Berlin> compilers? > > > > For Harmony I would say the leading contender is the java > > compiler that comes with Eclipse. It is written in java and > > already supports all the 1.5 features. > > > > As far as gcj goes, the new 1.5-ish front end I'm writing has > > a standalone part which does all the language processing and > > bytecode generation. It does not depend on the rest of gcc > > at all. It is written in C++. > > > > kjc is also out there and being developed, but I don't know > > much about it. > > > > The Eclipse compiler is already being embedded in Tomcat and works well. > It also has the advantage of a liberal Apache compatible licence. > > There is also the Jikes compiler (which isn't the same as the Eclipse > compiler, nor the Jikes RVM). > > Nick > > IMPORTANT: This e-mail, including any attachments, may contain private or > confidential information. If you think you may not be the intended > recipient, or if you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the > sender immediately and delete all copies of this e-mail. If you are not the > intended recipient, you must not reproduce any part of this e-mail or > disclose its contents to any other party. > This email represents the views of the individual sender, which do not > necessarily reflect those of education.au limited except where the sender > expressly states otherwise. > It is your responsibility to scan this email and any files transmitted > with it for viruses or any other defects. > education.au limited will not be liable for any loss, damage or > consequence caused directly or indirectly by this email. >
