On 07-06-2005 23:55, "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First, as part of the Apache Harmony project, we keep a registry of > all 'bulk' contributions.
+1 > Second, any contribution by an individual committer that is "bulk" - > a quantity of code that is "re-purposed", "re-licensed" or "re- > contributed", e.g. any bit of code that had been used elsewhere - be > also registered as such. +1 > 3) All Authors Are Committers > > If you did not write the material yourself, are all of > the authors committers to Apache Harmony and authorized to > participate in the related project component? If not, > then you should not submit this Contribution, although the > Corporate Contributor License Agreement may apply. I think we may want to define or stick to a definition of "contributor". We may have people signing a CLA and/or a code grant but not wanting to become a committer (maybe they've lost interest in the code alltogether), nor would you want people to get committer priviledges and responsibilities just be throwing some code at us. > Comments? Looks pretty good, but what a pain to implement! :-) I think we should strive to maximize throughput of this process. Using SVN is a good example, perhaps having some commandline tools to aid all this makes sense as well. LSD
