On Jul 7, 2005, at 1:57 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Yeah. Ideally bits and pieces, as they are contributed to
Harmony would
be licensed under the Apache license or even more liberal licenses,
Allright. I'll bite. What's more liberal? I consider that the
AL is
the most liberal of the commonly found languages as it gives the
users
full freedom to do as they choose not only with the licensed
software,
but with any derivative works or additional innovation they may
combine
with it...
Sorry for sounding confusing, I meant BSD (without advertising), 'Do
What You F*ing Want License', public domain, and similar permissive
(and
biref) arrangements. The Apache 2.0 License is pretty nice and liberal
as software licenses go :)
Thanks for clarifying.
geir
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
