Tim Ellison wrote: > Recently, within IBM, we have been defining the interface between IBM's > class library and the J9 VM. We deliberately haven't looked at the GNU > Classpath/VM interface specification. <snip/> > If there is an interest, we can share the interface we are using and > evolve it as part of harmony. It would be great if we could share > experiences with the GNU Classpath VM interface in such a way that the > Harmony interface was suitable for the widest variety of VMs and class > libraries.
Cool! It'd be real interesting to try and get n-way interop (eg use classpath and the J9 VM together, use the J9 classlib and gcj together, ...). I can see how much good stuff could come from that. cheers, Leo