On Sep 20, 2005, at 9:36 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
So let's do it then...Everyone interested should fill in their
paperwork by end of the month. First week next month we can have a
VOTE on the PPMC for each person based on their contributions so far.
(Let each person state what they are bringing to the table as well if
they haven't already). So by end of October we should have a roster of
folks with commit privs who can then vote in the next set of
committers (or as and when they want to).
I really don't want to wait another 4 months and see that we are still
in the same situation as we are in today.
We won't be. I'll post another note outlining what I think we should
do, and we can agree.
geir
Thanks,
dims
On 9/20/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 20, 2005, at 9:11 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Geir,
When folks have sent in their ACQ/ICLA, we should give them direct
commit access (after maybe a VOTE on the ppmc list). I really don't
like putting so many road blocks, what exactly are we waiting for?
What roadblocks are you talking about?
We certainly want a vote and not just make everyone who fills in
paperwork a committer. I don't think we need a high bar to entry,
but at least a patch, maybe? This is a good subject to discuss.
*Any* bulk contribution - i.e. code created outside of the day to day
flow of the project by committers should come into a JIRA so the
contribution can be inspected and understood to be a clearly
delineated contribution. We will be keeping a record of all such
contributions.
geir
Assuming that all is well with the ACQ, this means that we can
accept
the code you have put in the WIKI into SVN for people to start
playing with. You will have to add the code to a JIRA entry for
the
project, so you can definitively offer it under the Apache license.
Thanks,
dims
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/ - Oxygenating The Web Service
Platform
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
