What? I was talking about having a contributor page *and* an AUTHORS
file, independent of the in-file author tag issue, and quite frankly,
I think we should do it now as people are contributing. If anyone
has a real problem with the httpd-style committers page and tracking
AUTHORS in a file, please speak up.
And I know you weren't intentionally dissing non-coding contributions
to Harmony, but we should be clear that code isn't the only thing
that matters. It's clearly very important, but as this is going to
be a big project, we welcome any and all help :)
geir
On Oct 3, 2005, at 1:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, I think it is too early for this to go to a vote. Right now,
all of the binding votes would be cast by people who haven't
written any code on the project. I would favor addressing this
issue once there are some active committers. For now laissez-faire
should rule.
-Andy
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Oct 3, 2005, at 11:48 AM, Dan Lydick wrote:
I have looked at the HTTPD contributors page and I like it.
I have also looked at the AUTHORS file in Archie Cobbs' code
and I like it as well.
If I had to choose between the two, I'd choose both.
That was my intention. On the website where it's easy to point
to and easy for people to find, and one in the code so that as
you way, it carries with the source.
Thanks Dan.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
