Jean-Frederic, This is the area of the code I am working on fast and furious. I have used this macro as a place holder to say, "Stop the world! It doesn't work yet!" I am hoping to get all of these STUB instances removed in the next week or so when I get all the code done that it stubs out. Any change here will be removed anyway because the code will be implemented. If you want to do this locally, it might mean something to you, but overall, the need for it will be going away soon.
Dan Lydick -----Original Message----- From: Jean-frederic Clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Oct 31, 2005 4:47 PM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [BootJVM] jvm/src/opcode.c patch Hi, I would like to propose the following patch: +++ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/harmony/enhanced/trunk/sandbox/contribs/bootjvm/bootJVM> svn diff jvm/src/opcode.c Index: jvm/src/opcode.c =================================================================== --- jvm/src/opcode.c (revision 329310) +++ jvm/src/opcode.c (working copy) @@ -985,7 +985,7 @@ * creating better readability of the code. */ -static void dummy1(void) { char *p, *dummy2; dummy2 = p; dummy1(); } +static void dummy1(void) { void (*p)()=NULL; p(); } #define STUB { dummy1(); } switch(opcode) +++ The idea is to core ASAP when we reach a not yet supported opcode, any comment? Cheers Jean-Frederic Dan Lydick