On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 07:16 -0800, Leo Simons wrote: > I didn't take notes but one of the many things I took away from this is that > it might > be a real good idea to try and see if classpath can be LGPLed; Mark seemed to > think > that is not an unattainable goal. When I get my hands on some spare time (I > hope it'll > be under the christmas tree) I hope to push forward om some of that.
I don't understand this. The GNU Classpath license was designed to be even more liberal than the LGPL. What makes relicensing GNU Classpath to LGPL a good idea? AG
