I'd prefer harmony-legal@ for the same reason as Leo (I can't read legal-discuss either). Better still, legal-discuss-public@
Hopefully it will put a stop to those pesky code discussion interruptions ;-) Regards, Tim Leo Simons wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 08:49:24AM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > >>So... can we consider this topic done (with the exception of dalibar >>getting the last word in response to my last post), at least from the >>POV of trying to make progress on it here on the Harmony list, and >>move it over to legal-discuss? This is a committer-only list, so not >>everyone can participate, but if we promise to bring the results >>back, will that work? > > > I'm fine with moving discussion elsewhere. But I'm not on legal-discuss > precisely because its committer-only. > > >>If not, shall we start harmony-legal@ list? > > > That might make sense. > > LSD > -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
