Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >> No longer necessary. Neither would it be relevant to this project, nor >> would it be really interesting, as at the core, the licensing stuff is >> only useful for obviously trivial setups, and it won't get us what we >> need. > > > ? >
See Leo's mail on the differences between ratification of trivial and non-trivial licensing setups. That made me realize that what's working for httpd would be hard through to push through as equivalent for this project, and would not entail the benefits I'd like, i.e. working with actual source code. cheers, dalibor topic
