[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Some more platform tree names: > > solaris32.sparc solaris64.sparc > linux32.sparc linux64.sparc > darwin32.ppc (Is this correct for the new MAC boxes?)
Wouldn't the wordsize be better associated with the processor family? So solaris.sparc32, windows.x86, linux.ppc32, and so on. Maybe in some components we would want to include a window manager family too, though let's cross that bridge... I had a quick hunt round for a recognized standard or convention for OS and CPU family names, but it seems there are enough subtle differences around that we should just define them for ourselves. Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
