On 1/18/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Its an extension to security, not harmony, so I would have thought: > org.apache.harmony.xsecurity
I like this one x_security would also be good. I do not like mixing support classes for two completely different packages. It might happen in the future that we will want to split java.security and javax.security to different components. In this case splitting support cases will not be very smooth. Thanks, Mikhail > > Regards, > Tim > > > Thanks, > > Stepan > > On 1/18/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 1/18/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Mikhail Loenko wrote: > >>>> Seems like I've managed to reproduce the problem: > >>>> > >>>> I've refactored the code using Eclipse: all that is under > >>>> com.openintel.drl.security > >>>> I've moved under > >>>> org.apache.harmony > >>> Can you make that org.apache.harmony.security -- then we keep the module > >>> name in there. When we build into a single rt.jar it will avoid any > >>> unfortunate name collisions with implementations in other modules. > >> my misprint in the mail... > >> > >>>> Then I've searched for and found 18 files that still contained > >>>> "com.openintel.drl.security" for some reason, and made > >>>> search&replace > >>>> > >>>> After that build failed: > >>>> BUILD FAILED > >>>> build.xml:393: Test java.security.serialization.CodeSignerTest failed > >>>> > >>>> Will investigate... > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> BTW, where will we move "com.openintel.drlx" to? > >>>> > >>>> org.apache.harmony_x ? > >>>> org.apache.harmonx ? > >>>> org.apache.hx ? > >>> Yuk! let's stick with org.apache.harmony.<whatever> package names. > >> how would you distinguish between support classes for > >> java.security and javax.security? > >> > >> we need org.apache.something > >> and org.apache.extension_of_something > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Mikhail > >> > >> > >>> Regards, > >>> Tim > >>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Mikhail > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 1/18/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> I've just updated from SVN, all unit tests from security2 passed > >>>>> (including serialization ones). > >>>>> Could you please provide more details? > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Mikhail > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 1/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>>> I am haplessly plodding along. I found one problem (mine) which > >> fixed a > >>>>>> test, and now I seem to have a more interesting problem with the > >>>>>> serialization tests... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Are the serialization tests "golden data" files somehow > >> dependent the > >>>>>> com.openintel package structure and would be allergic to a > >>>>>> org.apache.harmony package structure? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> geir > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > >>>>>>> I've been trying to refactor security2 into the org.apache pacakage > >> space. > >>>>>>> I'm now having test failures. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Can someone else do a co of security2 and verify? I've backed out > >> the > >>>>>>> change so that you need junit and bcprov on your classpath (argh!) > >> and > >>>>>>> turned on haltonfailure so that the tests will stop once something > >> goes > >>>>>>> wrong. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I thought I was being careful - while it's clear that I have no > >> idea > >>>>>>> what I'm doing, there's clearly something a little more subtle > >> going on > >>>>>>> here because I wouldn't think that just moving package names would > >> be a > >>>>>>> problem. I assume that there's some provider or other > >> configuration-ish > >>>>>>> issue. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> This would be a good learning experience for all of us how this > >> works. I > >>>>>>> need to run out for about 20 min... bbiab. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> geir > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> -- > >>> > >>> Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > >>> IBM Java technology centre, UK. > >>> > > > > -- > > Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > IBM Java technology centre, UK. >
