On 1/18/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...

> In my world, 'implementation tests' and 'API tests' can both be Unit
> tests (i.e. that's the style of test, not what they are testing).  I
> disagree with Stepan that all tests should be defined in the same
> package as the implementation and be run on the bootclasspath.

This is misunderstanding. Stepan's  'unit tests' is your
'implementation tests'
that, as I understand you, could be in the bootclasspath.
Your 'API test' is my either 'compatibility' or 'functional' tests.

Probably we need to define some terminology to be on the same plate :)

Thanks,
Mikhail

Reply via email to