> >Sounds dirty. How about security-x? > Ok. I named it by analogy with x-net. Your variant works for me.
Thanks, Stepan On 1/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sounds dirty. How about security-x? > > Stepan Mishura wrote: > > I agree with the proposal and I'm ready to start working on a patch for > > splitting 'security2' into suggested components and integrating them > with > > the current build. > > > > Also I'd like to suggest a name for a new component: 'x-security'. > > > > Thanks, > > Stepan Mishura > > Intel Middleware Products Division > > > > > > > > On 1/19/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hello > >> > >> Let's start a different thread for that. > >> > >> I suggest revisiting current componentization for security related > parts. > >> Now we have for example crypto architecture in security module but > >> crypto extension in the crypto module. > >> > >> See natural components in the UserGuide > >> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/ > >> > >> The proposal is to have 3 components: > >> 1. general security & crypto > >> 2. ssl > >> 3. jaas > >> > >> The logical content of those components would be: > >> 1. > >> - General Security > >> - Certification Path > >> - JCE > >> > >> 2. > >> - JSSE > >> > >> 3. > >> - JAAS > >> - JGSS > >> - SASL > >> > >> > >> Physical content of those components: > >> > >> 1. > >> java.security > >> javax.crypto > >> javax.security.cert > >> 2. > >> javax.net > >> 3. > >> javax.security w/o javax.security.cert > >> org.ietf > >> > >> Opinions? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Mikhail Loenko > >> Intel Middleware Products Division > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > > -- Thanks, Stepan Mishura Intel Middleware Products Division
