Nathan Beyer wrote: > Not that my vote counts for a huge amount, it does with me ... you have sent in good patches, so I care what you think.
> but as long as there's a new IBM > Harmony VME or alternative available in a reasonable amount of time, do as > you please. The plan is to make the VME V2 available before the reorg of classlib that requires it. > As I prefer to stick with hacking around in the classlib modules > and leave the rocket science up the smart folk, I'm very dependent on a > working VM to build and execute test cases against. understood - me too. Regards, Tim > That's my two cents worth. > > -Nathan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 8:58 AM > To: harmony-dev > Subject: [classlib] creating a new snapshot, and planned breakage heads-up > > I'd like to propose that we create a new snapshot of the classlib code > and make it available on the binary downloads page: > http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/harmony/snapshots/ > > Now that the security2 code is integrated into the build it seems a good > time to refresh the snapshot, and there have been quite a few fixes in > other parts. > > In addition, and once the snapshot is safely tucked away, I'd like to > break the world :-) > > I want to rename some of the packages in LUNI from com.ibm to > org.apache. Some of these packages are referenced by kernel code, which > means that there will need to be a new IBM Harmony VME made available on > Developerworks. Unfortunately (due to the renaming) you will not be > able to use an old Harmony VME with the new classlib code and vice versa. > > Please indicate ASAP if you object to this renaming work taking place > within the next couple of days. > > Regards, > Tim > -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
