I actually have an objection to *that* name, so I will if you don't...
Tim Ellison wrote:
I meant it's copyright / license block comment.
Same reason every other files does.
...and why drl.policy? any objection to changing it back?
Regards,
Tim
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
java.security also does not have a license...
Why do you think they have to have a license?
Thanks,
Mikhail
On 2/17/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
why has our permissions policy file (in jre/lib/security) gone from
java.policy -> drl.policy, lost its license etc. ?
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK.
