Yep, agreed. 2006/2/21, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > yes, let me refine my position. > > I don't object to using the C++ language where it makes sense, e.g. to > simplify things. IMHO the jaasnix native code's usage is somewhat > gratuitous, and results in a larger binary for no great benefit. > > If people want to use vanilla C++ features then sure, but we have to be > mindful of portability problems that would be caused by the areas of C++ > that typically vary amongst implementations -- so dependencies on a > particular STL, use of C++ exceptions / RTTI, etc. are all areas asking > for portability trouble in the future. > > Regards, > Tim
-- Alexey A. Petrenko Intel Middleware Products Division
