LOL -- yes, we know what you meant Paulex; or to put it another way 'we all heard what we wanted to hear'.
Regards, Tim Anton Avtamonov wrote: > On 2/27/06, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The second line, I meant to be: >> 2. if RI is contradict with spec, and RI is not logical(sometimes it is >> very obvious, you know what I mean), we comply with _*SPEC*_; else, we >> discuss it case by case. > > I also missed that! > The idea was absolutely clear, particular words are not important :-) > > -- > Anton Avtamonov, > Intel Middleware Products Division > -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
