So I (ahem) 'tested' the build machine by checking in some code that would not compile, at 16:23 GMT today -- but no complaint sent on the dev list?
Regards, Tim Mark Hindess wrote: > On 21/02/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Mark Hindess wrote: >>> On 21/02/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Mark Hindess wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Is there any interest in having build status emails sent to this list? >>>>> I'm building classlib trunk with continuum and it would be simple for >>>>> me to have messages like the following sent to the list whenever the >>>>> status of our builds change. Currently I'm building only on linux but >>>>> I plan to get windows builds running in the next few days. >>>> Cool. Please, only send changes (pass->fail, fail->pass). >>> Agreed. >>> >>> Done. (Will the non-subscriber [EMAIL PROTECTED] be able to send >>> to the list or is there something that needs to be done to avoid >>> moderation/spam filtering?) >> We can certainly add that.. > > Thanks. > >>>>> Currently the builds are running the default target in make/build.xml >>>>> but if there was a top-level build-and-test target then I could run >>>>> that instead. This might produce more useful results. >>>> Ah. Can you do a sequence : >>>> >>>> $ cd make >>>> $ ant >>>> $ cd .. >>>> $ ant -f build-test.xml >>> The current build is just a direct "svn co" and ant project at >>> present. My next step is to use a local repository with svn:externals >>> pulling in the harmony trunk so I'll have more flexibility. However, >>> I suspect more people might run the test target if this process was >>> simplified. Of course, as Tim mentioned it's not trivial because of >>> the requirement for a VM and other dependencies so perhaps it is not >>> worth it. >> I think it is. It's great that you have a private version of this >> running now for us, but we want to get to a point where >> >> a) anyone can do it >> >> b) The one that we reun for the project is running here on apache >> infrastructure > > I agree. I'd be happy to run it on apache infrastructure. I'd be > happy to move development of the build-test-publish wrapper to apache > infrastructure but that might slow things down a little. > >>> I'm going to concentrate on testing first - since the test results are >>> probably more important than the actual build artifacts at this point >>> - but wrapping the build should also allow me to add a publish step to >>> our parent build if there was somewhere I could publish to? >> Lets get that working - we can then run it here and have it publish >> locally to the infrastructure... > > Agreed. > > Nothing we are doing here is really private except in that it is > currently running on a private server. That's really a matter of > getting results while avoiding the logistical issues - hardware, > access, compiler licenses, etc - of running it on apache > infrastructure. When it is working we can resolve those issues. > Until it is working there isn't really much incentive. > > Regards, > Mark. > > >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>>> From: Apache Harmony Build <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> Date: 20-Feb-0006 11:04 >>>>> Subject: [continuum] BUILD SUCCESSFUL: Classlib/linux.ia32 >>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Online report : >>>>> http://ibmonly.hursley.ibm.com/continuum/linux.ia32/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/1/buildId/44 >>>>> Build statistics: >>>>> State: Ok >>>>> Previous State: Failed >>>>> Started at: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:03:46 +0000 >>>>> Finished at: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:04:56 +0000 >>>>> Total time: 1m 9s >>>>> Build Trigger: Forced >>>>> Exit code: 0 >>>>> Building machine hostname: hy2 >>>>> Operating system : Linux >>>>> Java version : 1.4.2(IBM Corporation) >>>>> >>>>> Changes >>>>> No files changed >>>>> >>>>> **************************************************************************** >>>>> Output: >>>>> **************************************************************************** >>>>> [snip] > > -- > Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > IBM Java Technology Centre, UK. > -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
