Mark Hindess wrote:
On 3/16/06, Magnusson, Geir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What was I concerned about?
...
On Mar 3, 2006 11:36 AM you wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
I've been spending a little time fixing up contributions that I think
are worthwhile - mostly patches that have been broken by the recent
shared native code moves that Tim committed. I'm willing to do this
because I broke them ;-) but mostly because I know it helps reduce the
load on committers and because having your patch broken/delayed can be
discouraging for new contributors.
I'm actually a little worried about patches to patches because then the
provenance becomes unclear if there's a problem in the future. Hm.
Which seemed to me to be a fairly reasonable concern.
Yes - ok. I guess there's a difference between a code fix kind of patch
and a "hey, this new build target for ant", but maybe not.
Something to ponder...
geir
