Mark Hindess wrote:
On 4/3/06, George Harley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
Personally, I'd raise JIRA's one at a time when you have fixes
prepared. That way they can be discussed and we can firm up our
policy on matching behaviour.
You mean raise JIRA's one type/package at a time don't you ? One issue
per method sounds like it would be a bit excessive !
I was assuming one JIRA per issue was a given. I obviously wasn't
suggesting splitting a single issue across multiple JIRAs. I wouldn't
want to overload our committers! ;-)
I was just suggesting that we don't bundle up similar but clearly
unrelated issues together. For instance, we shouldn't bundle issues
such as "java.lang.String.valueOf(null)" and
"java.beans.Encoder.writeExpression(null)" not throwing
NullPointerExceptions together.
Sure. Agreed.
Best regards,
George
Regards,
Mark.
--
Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Java Technology Centre, UK.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
