Mark Hindess wrote:
On 4/11/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
It's not too late to think about it once again and probably revisit
the decision.
BTW, I don't think of this as a blanket rule-of-law, but rather a
guideline, a motivation for how we make decisions on a bug-by-bug or
issue-by-issue basis.
As I understand goal #1 is to meet needs of as many potential users as we can
and decision to be spec incompatible in favor of new hot RI version might be
not the best one.
I think I agree :)
Mikhail makes it sound like this is just an aberation in the RI - and
I might agree with you/him if I thought that is what it was - but as I
mention earlier both IBM and BEA implementations have the same
behaviour.
It might be because they use the same class library as the RI :)
Do we really want to take a different path to what must be
the most common 5.0 implementations?
No, and I'm not sure why you think I disagree with that.
geir
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
