Well, you will need to build-up dependency info anyway, right? Therefore probably that would be a good chance to revise and update manifests :-)?
-- Anton Avtamonov, Intel Middleware Products Division On 4/12/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW AFAIK we do not test whether manifests list all imports/exports > > So if we create data from manifests then it could be insufficient and > we might have the same failures we had yesterday. > > Thanks, > Mikhail > > 2006/4/12, Anton Avtamonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 4/12/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Why have a static file? Why not just generate from the modules > > > manifests? Then the error can only be in one place - the dependent > > > module... right? > > > > If they have enough info - of course! That would be excellent. > > I suppose it is a bit not trivial since the required information is > > not the modules the particular module is depended on, but all the > > modules which depend on the particular module. However it should be > > not hard to revert. > > Did I catch your idea right? > > > > -- > > Anton Avtamonov, > > Intel Middleware Products Division > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
