2006/4/17, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 4/17/06, Anton Avtamonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Well, not completely agree. I RI has BUG, I agree to have > > corresponding Harmony test failing. However do you think that > > different exception messges say is a good reason to have failures? I > > don't think so. Just a minor differemce which can be 'formally > > documented' by using isHarmony() is tests. > > > I agree with you that different exception messages are not failures. So in > my opnion, we'd better avoid such test cases. > If some exception messages are really very important to developers ( I don't > have any idea about such Exception classes),
Hi Andrew Look at tests/api/java/util/regex/PatternSyntaxExceptionTest to get some ideas. When you parse something and that something is incorrect the message does matter. And you have a test to verify that you do not report ()s mismatch when the problem is somewhere else. Thanks, Mikhail > I think RI should contain similiar information so that we can write some > test cases, which both RI and Harmony could pass, by verifying keywords > instead. > If "isHarmony()" is used, then what's the expected message? I don't think > there's a "Harmony exception message spec" :-) > People may argue which message is best or more meanfuling :) > > Wishes, > > -- > > Anton Avtamonov, > > Intel Middleware Products Division > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > Andrew Zhang > China Software Development Lab, IBM > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
