On 4/24/06, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I thought that we agreed on utilizing JUnit's exception handling (see [1]).
> > So the next code from added unit test doesn't follow this convention. Also
> > why it checks the same code twice?
> >
> > try {
> > Inet6Address.getByAddress("123", addr2, 3);
> > } catch (UnknownHostException e) {
> > fail("no exception should be thrown");
> > }
> > try {
> > Inet6Address.getByAddress("123", addr2, 3);
> > } catch (UnknownHostException e) {
> > fail("no exception should be thrown");
> > }
>
> Sorry, it's a mistake. It's assumed use "-1" in the second case.
> I'll upload a patch right away.
And as we discussed try/catch is not required here, right?
--
Anton Avtamonov,
Intel Middleware Products Division
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
