I'll add my vote to using the [topic] markers. This works well for other
Apache projects like Jakarta Commons. I think they've split of some separate
mailing lists, but this was based on the sheer volume for certain projects.

I'd also add using the [topic] markers in subject line of JIRA issues too,
but that may not be everyone's liking.

-Nathan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Etienne Gagnon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 8:51 AM
> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [admin] Split the list (was RE: Split the list ?)
> 
> I agree with Geir.  It's a good idea to keep classlib and vm people
> aware of what the others are doing.  Sometimes, issues that might seem
> unrelated by classlib or vm people might actually affect the other
> group.  I much prefer the suggested [topic] approach.
> 
> Etienne
> 
> Magnusson, Geir wrote:
> > I've thought about it, but I think that it's a bit premature.  Why?
> > Because I think that once we fracture the list traffic, we lose a lot of
> > the intermixing that's important.
> >
> > I think once we have a lot more VM traffic, it makes perfect sense.
> >
> > However, I think that as an intermediate step though we should all work
> > very hard to tag our subject lines with a [topic] :)
> 
> --
> Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D.            http://www.info2.uqam.ca/~egagnon/
> SableVM:                                       http://www.sablevm.org/
> SableCC:                                       http://www.sablecc.org/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to