I'll add my vote to using the [topic] markers. This works well for other Apache projects like Jakarta Commons. I think they've split of some separate mailing lists, but this was based on the sheer volume for certain projects.
I'd also add using the [topic] markers in subject line of JIRA issues too, but that may not be everyone's liking. -Nathan > -----Original Message----- > From: Etienne Gagnon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 8:51 AM > To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [admin] Split the list (was RE: Split the list ?) > > I agree with Geir. It's a good idea to keep classlib and vm people > aware of what the others are doing. Sometimes, issues that might seem > unrelated by classlib or vm people might actually affect the other > group. I much prefer the suggested [topic] approach. > > Etienne > > Magnusson, Geir wrote: > > I've thought about it, but I think that it's a bit premature. Why? > > Because I think that once we fracture the list traffic, we lose a lot of > > the intermixing that's important. > > > > I think once we have a lot more VM traffic, it makes perfect sense. > > > > However, I think that as an intermediate step though we should all work > > very hard to tag our subject lines with a [topic] :) > > -- > Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D. http://www.info2.uqam.ca/~egagnon/ > SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/ > SableCC: http://www.sablecc.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]