On 5/10/06, Tim Ellison wrote:
Stepan Mishura (JIRA) wrote: <snip> > 2) To avoid casting while-loop was replaced with for-loop. Could you review the change? I was scratching my head about this cast, so I was very pleased to see your elegant solution. I must admit that I don't really understand why the for-loop version is inherently different (other than it 'hides' the casting) -- but I've learned a new pattern there :-)
Well, as far as I understand new for-loop version was designed to simplify iteration on collections so I just applied it for this case - nothing outstanding. However a side effect of 'hiding' the cast was some kind of disclosure for me. Frankly speaking, I also don't understands some aspects of using generics :-) Thanks, Stepan Regards,
Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Thanks, Stepan Mishura Intel Middleware Products Division ------------------------------------------------------ Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
